The result will be that the winner is not the person who was born with the best genetic potential to be strongest. The winner will be the person with a combination of the genetic potential, training, psychology, and judgment.Olympic performance would be the result of human creativity and choice, not a very expensive horse race. You can use this password for unlimited period and you can share it with your friends!
The result will be that the winner is not the person who was born with the best genetic potential to be strongest. The winner will be the person with a combination of the genetic potential, training, psychology, and judgment.
Their ideal is superhuman performance, at any cost.
The use of performance enhancing drugs in the modern Olympics is on record as early as the games of the third Olympiad, when Thomas Hicks won the marathon after receiving an injection of strychnine in the middle of the race.
Much of the writing on the use of drugs in sport is focused on this kind of anecdotal evidence.
There is very little rigorous, objective evidence because the athletes are doing something that is taboo, illegal, and sometimes highly dangerous.
On arrival, he screamed “We won” and dropped dead from exhaustion.
The marathon was run in the first modern Olympics in 1896, and in many ways the athletic ideal of modern athletes is inspired by the myth of the marathon.In 1992, Vicky Rabinowicz interviewed small groups of athletes.She found that Olympic athletes, in general, believed that most successful athletes were using banned substances.Yet despite the health risks, and despite the regulating bodies’ attempts to eliminate drugs from sport, the use of illegal substances is widely known to be rife.It hardly raises an eyebrow now when some famous athlete fails a dope test.The International Amateur Athletic Federation estimates that only 10–15% of participating athletes are tested in each major competition.investigated the suggestion that athletes face a kind of prisoner’s dilemma regarding drugs.The goal of a horse race is to find the fastest horse. The winner is the one with the best combination of biology, training, and rider. This was the old naturalistic Athenian vision of sport: find the strongest, fastest, or most skilled man. Drugs that improve our natural potential are against the spirit of this model of sport. We can choose what kind of competitor to be, not just through training, but through biological manipulation.Human sport is different from animal sport because it is creative.The recent Olympic games in Athens were the first to follow the introduction of a global anti-doping code. The World Anti-Doping Agency code declares a drug illegal if it is performance enhancing, if it is a health risk, or if it violates the “spirit of sport”. We choose what kind of training to use and how to run our race. We are not flogged by a jockey on our back but drive ourselves.From the lead up to the games to the end of competition, 3000 drug tests were carried out: 2600 urine tests and 400 blood tests for the endurance enhancing drug EPO. Would legal and freely available drugs violate this “spirit”? Human sport is different from sports involving other animals, such as horse or dog racing. It is this judgment that competitors exercise when they choose diet, training, and whether to take drugs.