Therefore, the role of the death penalty as a way of reducing violence in any society seems to be unconvincing.
Though it may be denied, racial and ethnic prejudices still function in modern societies.
During this period, the defendant remains incarcerated and his or her maintenance is paid for with taxpayers’ money.
Additional pre-trial time is needed to impose a death sentence with the involvement law experts, attorneys, and additional trials (Dieter).
At first glance, it may seem maintaining a life-term prisoner is more burdensome for taxpayers. Dieter, the cost of a death penalty may amount to or even surpass the expenditures of handling less-severe punishments for similar cases.
Entertainment Company Business Plan - Thesis Statement For Capital Punishment Research Paper
The imposition of capital punishment requires complicated and numerous trials which can take a great amount of time.
Sometimes, a life-term incarceration penalty may be even more of a deterrent for criminals than an execution, especially if state prison conditions are known to be harsh.
Based on the aforementioned arguments, it is concluded that the death penalty is an unfair and rather ineffective means of punishment.
It is fine when they complement each other, but if they are skewed, it causes negative consequences.
Among all possible punishments, the death penalty is the most extreme, and likely, the most ineffective and unfair type of punishment for any crime.