Tags: Sales Business Plan Template PowerpointCreative Writing ListsType Two EssayHow To Produce A Business PlanUw Madison Creative WritingReal Essays Interactive Susan AnkerWriting Essays About Literature Katherine Acheson
The discussion section of your manuscript can be one of the hardest to write as it requires you to think about the meaning of the research you have done.An effective discussion section tells the reader what your study means and why it is important.That's what I have seen in most Discussion sections of journal articles (in engineering, public health and some pysch).
HOWEVER All Discussion sections I’ve read are My post on the difference between Description and Analysis should help you write Discussion sections.
https://t.co/oxz8u IY3Pd you should all read Graf and Birkenstein's They Say/I Say https://t.co/y DXHawbez1 as preparation to write Discussions – for the rhetorical moves.
More than explaining results, how your results link to broader debates.
pic.twitter.com/a19h E5FB9d — Dr Raul Pacheco-Vega (@raulpacheco) April 9, 2019 Discussion sections are particularly used in articles that follow the IMRAD model https://t.co/Fzun G4tnce I like this Power Point on what should go in each of the IMRAD sections https://t.co/SQLVLs D6JB – what I've found is that often times, Discussion sections are blended/morphed — Dr Raul Pacheco-Vega (@raulpacheco) April 9, 2019 For example, in this #Free2Download And Read World Development article, the discussion section is blended with the results.
If you now read the Discussion section, you'll see that in my yellow highlights, I've noted how this particular article contributes to the literature.
This is part of what should go in the Discussion section.In addition, the placement of a stent did not impact their rates of cardiac events in a statistically significant way. If you are not sure which results are the most important, go back to your research question and start from there.The most important result is the one that answers your research question.This is one of the most challenging questions people have ever asked me, because after looking through dozens of journal articles in my Mendeley database, I could not find a lot of them who used Discussion sections.I believe this idea of the Discussion component of an academic journal article (or book chapter, in some cases) comes from the IMRAD model of publishing, that is, papers that have at least the following five sections: Introduction, Methods, Results, Analysis and Discussion (hence the acronym).Personally, I neither like, nor do I often write this type of journal article.Even when I was a chemical engineer, I can’t recall that I read many papers in the IMRAD model, as they all had a variation (merging Discussion with Results, or Results with Conclusion, or Discussion with Conclusion).Our findings suggest that patients who had partially blocked arteries and were treated with a stent as the first line of intervention had no better outcomes than patients who were not given any surgical treatments.Our findings noted that patients who received stents demonstrated slightly higher rates of asthma than those who did not.Overall, that's how I distinguish Discussion from Results (linkage to broader works/debates).Piece extracted from: https://t.co/m O4b N6Vr BI pic.twitter.com/IQUz HNr3Pk — Dr Raul Pacheco-Vega (@raulpacheco) April 10, 2019 I am an Assistant Professor in the Public Administration Division of the Centre for Economic Research and Teaching, CIDE (Centro de Investigacion y Docencia Economicas, CIDE, AC) based out of CIDE Region Centro in Aguascalientes, Mexico.